July 9th, 2006 (12:34 pm)
current mood: restless
Sticky in-law situation..any suggestions?
Alright, my parents are paying for the reception with the exception of the open bar which FILs are paying for. When we had our final meeting with the reception hall, we were deciding whether or not to have a champagne toast for everybody or just the head table. The FILs said they wanted to pay for the toast too since it was part of the alcohol bill. They decide to have a toast of white wine for everybody with the exception of the head table, which would still get champagne (difference between bottle of wine and bottle of champagne is $5), which is completely fine with me. I assumed only the head table would get champagne anyways.
Fast forward to dinner last night with my parents, my dad said that he would prefer to have champagne for everybody or just the head table, not wine for the toast. He said he would pay the difference but how the heck do we approach that with the in-laws. I feel that any approach we take could be mis-construed as something rude. I broached the topic with Jim last night and he got upset saying that he didn't want his parents to "feel not good enough". Obviously this isn't my dad's intention.
What the heck should we do? This morning I told my dad that we should just leave it the way it is to avoid stepping on toes but he is dead set on having champagne.
Any thoughts?